(Fondly) Remembering Tony Tallarico

« Someone at Dell Comics decided it’d be swell to turn famous monsters into superheroes — an idea whose time never came. And just to make sure there were bad, they hired Tony Tallarico to draw them. » — — James Schumeister, with the sort of brickbat typically lobbed at Mr. Tallarico.

Last week, we lost, at the venerable age of eighty-eight, the controversial, much-maligned Tony Tallarico (Sept. 20, 1933 – Jan. 7, 2022). The case of Mr. Tallarico’s reputation is typical of mainstream US cartoonists who generally eschewed the superhero genre. His mistake, I suppose, is that he drew a handful of them, and in his own distinctive fashion to boot, thus sealing his doom in Fanboy court.

Yet there’s far more depth and variety to Tallarico’s career, and that’s should be remembered. Besides, those superhero comics were just light-hearted, unpretentious fun. Obviously not what the continuity-addicted True Believers craved.

Let’s take a tour of some of the highlights!

A page from Crazy Quilt, one of three stories Tallarico illustrated for my personal candidate for greatest horror comic book of all time, the unlikely one-shot Tales From the Tomb (Oct. 1962, Dell). Script and storyboard by John Stanley. Read the rest (complete with, fittingly, its analysis) of Crazy Quilt here.
Arguably, if Tallarico’s going to be remembered in comics and general history, it may be for this once-obscure but significant mid-60s creation. This is Lobo no. 1 (Dec. 1965, Dell Comics). Tallarico and writer D.J. Arneson hold different views as to the character’s genesis, as Canadian researcher Jamie Coville discovered in 2016. To his credit, Coville simply let the former collaborators present their respective side of the story. Read the resulting interviews here! And do check out the début issue itself, along with Tom Brevoort’s analysis… right here.

As reported in Alter Ego no. 106 (Dec. 2011, TwoMorrows): « On May 20, 2005, Tony Tallarico received the Pioneer Award, given for his co-creation of the first African-American comic book hero, Lobo, a post-Civil War cowboy who appeared in two issues of his own Dell/Western title. The honor was given at a ceremony held at Temple University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. »

A Tallarico ad from Eerie no. 20 (March 1969, Warren); given Tony’s propensity to keep it in the family, ten-to-one that “Danny Smith” is actually Anthony Tallarico, Jr.
Cryptozoologists take note! Creepy no. 26 (April 1969, Warren); script by editor Bill Parente. I just adore Uncle Creepy’s pose (great use of props!), not to mention the question mark mullet. Should be the hit of the next tonsorial season!
Joe Gill and Tallarico took over the handlebars of one of Charlton’s established hot-rodders, Ken King. Following the direction blazed by their predecessor, Jack Keller, King had become “the Most Hated Man on Wheels!” (in Drag-Strip Hotrodders no. 13, Jan. 1967, Charlton) after being unjustly accused of wrecking his best friend, Jerry Gerard, aka “The Nicest Guy in Racing” during a meet. The series’ unremittingly bleak portrayal of the racing scene is fascinating, and Gill and Tallarico wisely kept the pace. This is World of Wheels no. 26 (June 1969, Charlton); cover by Tallarico.
An in-house ad from Eerie no. 23 (September 1969, Warren), technically Vampirella’s first published appearance. Art by “Tony Williamsune”, the collective nom de plume adopted by frequent collaborators Tallarico and William ‘Bill’ Fraccio. According to Tallarico, their collaboration was quite fluid: both contributed to layout, pencils and inks, but Tony was the extroverted go-getter, while Bill was the quiet one.
A “Williamsune” splash from Creepy no. 31 (February 1970, Warren). Tallarico on his association with Fraccio: « I would pencil some, he would ink some, visa versa y’know one of those things. I was really the guy that went out and got the work. Bill never liked to do that. It would depend. If he was working on something else I would start a project too and do pencils. It was a fun time. » [ source ]
This is Abbott & Costello no. 14 (April 1970, Charlton), featuring the beloved veteran comedians’ crossover with the aforementioned Ken King. The look of the series is based upon Hanna-Barbera‘s 1967-68 The Abbott and Costello Cartoon Show rather than on the duo’s classic movies and routines. Besides, Lou Costello having passed away in 1959, his part was voiced by Stan Irwin (with Bud Abbott as… Abbott).
Preceding the advent of Jonah Hex by some months* in the Weird Western stakes, Geronimo Jones was a truly oddball oater series, in the best sense of the term. Created by Tallarico (script and inks) and José Delbo (pencils), Geronimo’s adventures ran for 9 issues (plus one that remains unpublished), from September, 1971 to January, 1973. Geronimo himself was essentially a young pacifist seeking his quiet place in the Old West, in the finest tradition. However, strange encounters and occurrences keep thwarting his noble goal. And none is more outlandish and shocking than what he comes up against in this issue, cover warning and all. This is Geronimo Jones no. 6 (June 1972, Charlton). The GCD credits the cover to Delbo alone, but the use of collage and halftone wash are telltale Tallarico trademarks… not to mention his distinctive lettering. My guess therefore is: pencils by Delbo, layout, inks and collage by Tallarico.
Tallarico and Fraccio did only a handful of stories in this wild, swirly style, including four for Charlton: The Curse of the Vampire in The Many Ghosts of Dr. Graves no. 44 (Jan. 1974, Charlton);
this one, Come See Our Ghost… in Haunted no. 16 (June 1974, Charlton); The Reuger Formula in Haunted no. 24 (Nov. 1975) and A Solemn Oath! in Ghostly Tales no. 118 (Nov. 1975). Let me assure you that the sort of bold inking on display here, while deceptively simple in appearance, takes unerring confidence and skill to achieve. Bravissimo!

By the mid-70s, with his main comics accounts defunct or dormant (Dell, Treasure Chest, Charlton), Tallarico, ever the astute and tireless businessman (another rare trait among cartoonists) simply stepped up and diversified his efforts, branching out and creating a market for himself. « In the 70s the whole business went kaput. Luckily I was able to transfer over into doing children’s books. I’ve been doing children’s books ever since. My wife went though a count several months ago. It was over a thousand titles. That’s a lot of children’s books. »

Here’s a lovely one: Things You’ve Always Wanted to Know About Monsters (1977, Grosset & Dunlap). From the author’s introduction: « My sincere thanks to the many motion picture studios who produced these great monster films. They have kept many a generation of fans ‘monsterized‘. My thanks to my parents, who did not forbid me to see these films when I was a boy. Instead, they brought out in me many of the questions that appear in this volume. They always stressed that monsters are another form of fictional entertainment. My thanks to my wife Elvira, and my daughter Nina**, who stood by while my son and I made a mess of the living room as we selected the many pictures that appear here. »

I should point out that I haven’t forgotten one of my favourite Tallarico projects, namely his charming work on the Bobby ShermanGetting Together” comic book (7 issues, Feb.-Oct. 1972, Charlton)… it’s just that I’ve already addressed the topic: check out Let’s Hear It for Bobby Sherman!

And what of his 1965 collaboration with The Shadow’s Walter Gibson, Monsters? Got you covered on that one as well!

I don’t know whether I’ll change anyone’s mind about Mr. Tallarico’s work, but I believe I can rest assured I gave it my best shot.

-RG

*Hex was introduced in All-Star Western no. 10 (Feb.-Mar. 1972, DC).

**My closest brush with the Tallaricos came in 2015 when I helped his daughter Nina identify and source some artwork she was selling on eBay for her dad. In my experience, a very nice lady. My sincere condolences to the bereaved family.

39 thoughts on “(Fondly) Remembering Tony Tallarico

  1. nealumphred January 15, 2022 / 13:14

    I was not a fan of Tony Tallarico’s work. If I opened a comic and saw it, I put that comic down. When his work (along with that of Jerry Grandenetti) began appearing in Jim Warren’s titles, I stopped buying them.

    The pages above do nothing to make me want to alter my memories, except for one: the “swirly style on “Come See Our Ghost” is groovy! I checked out “A Solemn Oath” and that style is very effective over the course of the story.

    PS: “The Reuger Formula” credits Tony Williamsune, another artist who leaves me unmoved.

    Like

    • gasp65 January 15, 2022 / 18:11

      Hi Neal!

      Though I was too young to experience first-hand that period of Warren’s history for myself, I suppose I might have reacted differently. Though the post-Archie Goodwin era certainly was a fallow one for Warren, it signalled the arrival of Tom Sutton, whose work I greatly enjoyed. And well, Grandenetti being one of my very favourite cartoonists (incidentally, he’d been there since the earliest days of Creepy, first ghosting for Joe Orlando, then under his own byline), I would have been on board with his presence. And, though mine is a minority opinion, I prefer the writing in the post-Goodwin era. Archie may have been the nicest man in comics, but his writing was generally pedestrian and formulaic (lord, those ‘twist’ endings…) — though there are certainly exceptions (Goodwin and Ditko’s ‘Room With a View’ is a masterpiece). I suspect that most Warren fans really cared only about the artwork, anyway.

      On the other hand, there was a lot worse than Tallarico to worry about, namely lots of reprints of too-recent material and the prevalence of such (imho) ‘Not Ready for Primetime Players’ as Dick Piscopo, Mike Royer, Billy Graham, William Barry, David Sinclair, John Fantucchio, Dave Cockrum, Frank Brunner and Jeff Jones… and that’s just a roster sampling from the early issues of Vampirella! At least the Spanish photo-tracers hadn’t taken over yet.

      As for Tallarico, at least you liked one page (and my post!), which in my book constitutes progress. And I’m really happy you enjoyed ‘Oath’. Ten-year-old me was baffled yet fascinated by its daring style when I received that issue back in the day.

      I thought that someone else had already blogged about ‘Come See Our Ghost…’, but I couldn’t find any trace of it at the time of my writing. I’m thinking I’ll feature it soon. Its groovy style aside, it’s a really cheeky piece of writing.

      As for Mr. ‘Williamsune’, he’s simply the collective pseudonym that Tony (Tallarico) and William (Fraccio) went by when they worked in tandem. From what I’ve experienced in terms of good collaborative chemistry, I surmise that they challenged and pushed each other into interesting directions and dimensions.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. nealumphred January 15, 2022 / 19:40

    G

    Yes, the artwork in the early Warren non-comic book comic books (Creepy, Eerie, and Blazing Combat) was the thing! Goodwin’s stories were so-so but with those artists, there could have been empty word balloons and I would have bought every issue!

    “Spanish photo-tracers” is funny—and apt.

    I enjoy your posts as your taste in comics is so much more catholic than mine so you cover artists and titles I ignored or loathed (once upon a time). Discovering I was “wrong” about a Grandenetti or a Tallarico is almost as much fun as discovering I was equally incorrect in my dislike of Tommy James & the Shondells.

    Keep on keepin’ on …

    N

    Like

    • gasp65 January 15, 2022 / 22:05

      Well, Neal, I can’t say I recall any other time that my tastes have ever been deemed ‘catholic’ (though I do quite enjoy reading ‘Treasure Chest of Fun & Fact’!) 😉

      Must be a matter of defining one’s terms: in my view, ‘catholic’ would entail deep abiding affection for the stylings of, to name but a few, Neal Adams, Jim Starlin, George Perez, Alex Ross, John Romitas Sr. and Jr., Berni Wrightson, Mike Grell, Paul Gulacy, Marshall Rogers, Richard Corben, Todd McFarlane, John Byrne, Gil Kane, John and Sal Buscema, Frank Miller… not exactly our personal Dream Team. ‘Catholic’ would mean liking Kirby and Ditko… but for the wrong reasons.

      Favourite Tommy James and the Shondells track: “One Two Three and I Fell”, B-side to “Mony Mony”. Overall favourite Tommy James track: “Draggin’ the Line”. 😉

      Liked by 1 person

      • Krackles January 16, 2022 / 08:03

        Sorry guys but, what the heck are you talking about? Unless I missed something, your “Catholic” discussion makes no sense to me.

        As for Tony Tallarico, whose work I’m not familiar with, from the few samples I checked, it struck me as solid and versatile, but not catchy enough to be memorable.

        Tom Sutton? He did some decent inkings on Gil Kane’s pencils but I’m definitely no fan of his art.

        Liked by 1 person

      • gasp65 January 16, 2022 / 12:28

        Oh, it’s nothing so complicated: something got lost in translation, I think. Neal was saying my tastes were ‘catholic’, which I thought to mean ‘orthodox’, conventional or mainstream. By catholic, I think he actually meant ‘broad-ranging’, which makes more sense (and is far more flattering). Sorry, Neal!

        And Krackles, if you find Tallarico to be solid and versatile, my work his done. I don’t claim that he’s a grand master, but simply that he deserves more respect instead of being dismissed as one of the industry’s worst.

        As for Sutton, you mean those early-70s issues of Warlock? Unreadable, pretentious tripe… but nice art. But you really need to dig deeper with Sutton. His best work was done in the horror and SF genres for Charlton, Warren, and Marvel’s black-and-white Planet of the Apes mag… definitely not in superheroics.

        Liked by 1 person

      • nealumphred January 16, 2022 / 13:34

        KRACKLES

        I’m with you on Tallarico and Sutton—which possibly means that, like me, you are not as catholic in your tastes and appreciation for comic books artists as Gasp65.

        As for our host’s wide-ranging tastes, of the artists he lists above, my “deep” appreciation of/for extends only to Adams, Wrightson, Kane, J. Buscema, and Miller.

        Of course, Kirby and Ditko are deities to whom young, wannabe comic book artists should make sacrifices late at night when their parents are asleep.

        Keep on keepin’ on!

        NEAL

        PS: Here is a link to one of the few articles I have published about comic books (note the tentacles):

        https://www.nealumphred.com/with-wally-wood/

        Like

      • gasp65 January 16, 2022 / 22:18

        Thanks so much for sharing, Neal. That’s a fantastic article, moving and, dare I say it? — profound. I particularly appreciated the post-scripts. Any more pieces on related topics in the offing?

        Liked by 1 person

      • nealumphred January 17, 2022 / 09:08

        GASP65

        Regarding things I have published about comic books:

        • Go to Neal Umphred Dot Com (https://www.nealumphred.com/).
        • Click on “Categories” at the top of the homepage
        • Click on “Comic Books.”

        You will see a few more articles there.

        Best,

        NEAL

        Like

      • gasp65 January 17, 2022 / 11:31

        Thank you kindly, Neal. And man, that anecdote about the stupid record pricers is *glorious*! I won’t hesitate to dig further, I assure you.

        Liked by 1 person

  3. Krackles January 16, 2022 / 17:48

    OK, if you’re discussing the extent of your taste in comics, well, I believe I have quite a wide range myself: from classic Franco/Belgian to underground, from mainstream to experimental, from craftmanship to idiosyncratic.
    All of the artists you both mentioned are more or less mainstream (which isn’t a criticism as far as I’m concerned).

    In my youth, I did read some of Sutton’s work outside of the superheroes genre (to which he’s very ill suited, I agree) like “Planet of Apes” or his horror stories but, just like with the early work of Mike Ploog, it’s better to keep them as fond memories because it’s way too often a bit painful to revisit them.

    Liked by 1 person

    • gasp65 January 16, 2022 / 18:08

      Krackles, I think you misunderstand (à chacun son tour!) what I meant by my listing of artists. I was saying that someone with (what I took to mean) ‘catholic’ (that is to say, ‘mainstream or conventional’) tastes would be focusing on these popular favourites. Some of them I like, some I find wildly overrated, some I outright detest. And of course they’re all pretty mainstream: that’s my point.

      As for Ploog, I’m no fan, but isn’t his early work his only decent work? By which I mean, in the main, the first five issues of Marvel’s Frankenstein, into which he clearly poured his heart and soul — not that I’m impressed or anything.

      And if I recall correctly, you enjoy a good wallow in Ross Andru’s Spider-Man, but Sutton’s work is too painful to revisit? I can attest that our respective kilométrage varies wildly… let’s just leave it at that — that’s a pretty wide chasm to bridge!

      Liked by 1 person

      • Krackles January 16, 2022 / 18:33

        Gasp65,

        I don’t mean to be offending to Sutton but his style simply doesn’t appeal to me and his craftmanship doesn’t favorably compare to Andru (and yes, we should leave it at that, some things should remain clouded in mystery).

        I agree that Ploog early work had heart and soul but is too immature for me to enjoy it at the moment (mebbe later?) while I still love the early debuts of Barry Smith when he was aping Jack Kirby (probably more than his own current style).

        John Buscema and Gil Kane are great, a cut above most other mainstream artists.
        Adams is hit and miss but I’m forever in love with his short run on X-Men
        Gene Colan is way to often forgotten and that’s shameful!
        Kirby and Ditko belongs to a class of their own.

        PS: Andru’s Spider-man is wonderful stuff!

        Liked by 1 person

      • gasp65 January 16, 2022 / 19:44

        Oh, don’t worry — I’m not taking your dismissal of Sutton personally. Where would we be with such thin skins?

        Andru, however, I see as the worst kind of hack. He wasn’t bad in his early days, but by the 1960s, he was just recycling the same go-to pose… to the death. You know the one: three-quarter angle, legs bent* (I should make a collage!)

        In this, and it’s an astounding feat, he was even more rote and repetitive than ol’ Gil Kane. Worst of all were the late 1970s and early 1980s at DC, when he, inker Dick Giordano (and ace ‘art director’ Vince Colletta) created hundreds of dreadful, interchangeable, by-the-numbers covers. Some scars just don’t heal. And poses aside, I never dug his macrocephalic, hollow-eyed characters.

        Never mind Ploog; neither of us is a fan, that’s evident! I still find Barry Smith’s early work rather amateurish, but not *entirely* devoid of charm. His Conan wasn’t bad.. (I know… faint praise!) Again, clearly something he poured himself into. And the less said about his pointless return to comics, the better. Much like his fellow ‘The Studio’ deities, he had to come crawling back to tawdry comics because no-one could be bothered to worship him in the ‘real’ art world.

        I stand by my succinct estimation of John Buscema, written a few years ago on this blog: “Corner-cutting maestro and Marvel yes-man”. Certainly in a class with Gil Kane, that of talented artists not using said talent, cynically mercenary in Buscema’s case, high-minded but self-defeating in Kane’s, with largely the same results: massive œuvres of mind-numbing repetition.

        I’ve stated my case on Adams, and I can’t look at his mannered, overwrought work without cringing.

        With Colan, I’m totally on board . He did *so much* remarkable work for Marvel, both in colour and in black-and-white. In the 1970s especially, he was easily the most reliable component of the notoriously-leaky Marvel machine, not that he’s appreciated for it. While every other Marvel title went through a ceaseless (and often pointless) parade of short-lived creative “teams”, he was always on time and without any loss in quality (unless they stuck him with a bad inker, hardly his fault).

        Kirby and Ditko, the pantheon, of course. But let’s not take that for granted and forget how many fanboys just *hate* their work.

        And well, you certainly don’t need my permission to enjoy Andru’s Spider-Man. How strong the pull of nostalgia… 😉

        *The ‘classic’ Andru pose: https://tinyurl.com/2s3fbdex

        Like

  4. Krackles January 17, 2022 / 05:23

    Gasp65,

    What you can only see as a mere recycling of stock poses, I recognize as part of the process of refining and maturing a style AND the need to earn a decent living from its output. The same observation could be made for most, if not all, of his generation’s artists and it would be unfair to forget the context of an industry that has exploited artists so badly.

    I remember reading an essay on Peanuts by Umberto Eco in which he showed how Shulz’s drawings could be reduced to a very basic system and a handful standard poses. I like to believe that, for you as for me, counting the much maligned number of Andru’s poses does not tell the whole story.

    I’d love to see your collage of Andru’s iconic poses because I’m sure I’ll enjoy it very much (no sarcasm at all).

    How many “iconic” poses have Kirby or Ditko recycled on a regular basis? Both man villipended as hack, can you believe it? How many poses of a guy throwing a punch or swinging on a web line can you really make unique and original?

    Andru pulled it off with ease, he was believable, distinctive and therefore memorable.

    He was a very solid craftsman with an excellent command of perspective which he used in unparalleled cinematic storytelling sequences. I also appreciate his good use of cartoonish expressiveness, yes, what you describe as hollow-eyed macrocephalic characters (very apt and funny description by the way).

    In the late 70’s I think his eye problems got worse and this might further explain the angular distortion in his drawings. His art declined rapidly, as did Jack Kirby around the same time. Clearly, the same countless hours spent on the drawing board took a heavy toll on both men’s health. Add to the mix the probable friendly pressure of bean counters for interchangeable BUT bankable covers and you get a sad picture of the twilight of a great artist.

    More on Kane and Buscema later, I hope (about whom we surprisingly both agree AND disagree at the same time)…

    Liked by 1 person

    • gasp65 January 17, 2022 / 15:55

      Krackles — you wrote: “What you can only see as a mere recycling of stock poses, I recognize as part of the process of refining and maturing a style AND the need to earn a decent living from its output. The same observation could be made for most, if not all, of his generation’s artists and it would be unfair to forget the context of an industry that has exploited artists so badly.”

      Judging by the Kane interviews I’ve read, even he didn’t believe that ‘refining and maturing’ bit in the end. The ‘earning a living’ bit is irrelevant, given the level playing field: all working cartoonists have to deal with that. In fact, it works against the first part of your argument: Kane had to hack it out because he consistently lived above his means and was always scrounging for money.

      Eco is right, of course: but Schulz’s economy served a different purpose, that of directness. Besides, it was largely a vehicle (albeit a most fitting one) for his writing, and he had plenty to express there. Compare that to Kane, who, when given total freedom with His Name Is… Savage!, showed us that all he wanted to do was an even more violent version of John Boorman’s Point Blank (starring Lee Marvin, Kane’s model for Savage). Much as I love Wally Wood, Witzend also betrayed the fact that most of that generation’s non-writing cartoonists, granted free rein, would just add tits ‘n’ ass (and/or gore) to the mainstream work they were so disillusioned with. Like birds that remain in their cage when the door is open.

      As for the recycling of “iconic” (how I loathe that word!) poses, it’s really a question of range! Kirby, for one, had dozens of these at least. I’m reminded of being struck by a scene from an early issue of Challengers of the Unknown where Rocky, Red, Prof and Ace are running down a beach… and Kirby gave each one their own distinctive posture and body language. In short, Andru just doesn’t have that kind of range, though of course it’s unfair to compare anyone to Kirby… but you’re the one who pulled the trigger. 😉

      True, poor Ditko did go through the motions terribly after a while. After the DC implosion and cancellation of Shade, he was just broken. He never really tried after that.

      I don’t deny that Andru was a solid craftsman. I suppose a lot of what I dislike about his work, inevitable, work-grind-driven repetition aside, is that he was pretty consistently ill-served by his inkers. He only has himself to blame for Mike Esposito, of course. But Giordano was such a poor fit.

      And you know, I suspect (it’s one of my pet theories) that he was one of the artists who suffered most when the comics industry switched to smaller original art pages in the late 1960s. This absurd cost-cutting move was made in order to fit more pages on a printing plate. Constrained to work at a smaller scale, many artists’ work deteriorated. Certainly, anyone with eye problems would have suffered. It’d be interesting to delve deeper into this. Ditko’s inking was never the same, and Herb Trimpe’s work lost something.

      Now, coming back ’round to my point: I was just as surprised as anyone might be, back in 1981, when I took a peek at the Tabloid-sized “Superman and His Incredible Fortress of Solitude”. Getting past the dreadful Andru-Giordano cover, I found the insides to be really attractive! In Romeo Tanghal, Andru finally found himself with a sympathetic, compatible embellisher, one who evidently understood his line. And Andru, as in the case of 1976’s ‘Superman vs The Amazing Spider-Man’ — though without the crappy Giordano inks — must have been able to work in a larger format. See what you think: https://readcomiconline.li/Comic/DC-Special-Series/Issue-26?id=62934

      I’ll wrap this up for now… this is turning into quite an epic forum discussion!

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Krackles January 17, 2022 / 05:47

    Thanks, Neal, for sharing your very own Wallace Wood moment for whom we do share a common appreciation!

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Krackles January 17, 2022 / 12:31

    Hey Neal, you put a cat on your homepage?
    Is it a (pretty) dirty catholic trick to attract more readers? 😛

    Liked by 1 person

    • nealumphred January 17, 2022 / 13:18

      K

      I found the photo of that cat while looking for something else entirely on the internet back in 2013. It’s not a doctored image but actually a photo of a kitten standing on its head:

      I was immediately and utterly charmed and “stole” it. After I started using it on that site’s homepage, I went looking for the owner to beg permission to use it (and credit the photographer) but never found the original photo again.

      N

      Like

  7. nealumphred January 17, 2022 / 12:45

    GASP65

    Imagine hearing about a comic book collection from the ’50s and ’60s for sale in your neighborhood and you get the first crack at buying it. The collection has thousands of DCs, Marvels, Gold Keys, Charltons, Towers, end everything to make your heart go pitter-patter! And everyone has “5¢” in black, felt-tip pen ink written in the upper right corner of the front cover.

    Then you wake up and realize it’s a bad dream, probably caused by an undigested bit of beef, a blot of mustard, a crumb of cheese, a fragment of underdone potato, or that damn article Neal wrote …

    NEAL

    Like

    • Krackles January 17, 2022 / 13:10

      Neal,

      Just picture Gasp65 finding a mint collection of each and every comicbook Ross Andru ever drew?
      That would make my day!

      Liked by 1 person

      • nealumphred January 17, 2022 / 18:48

        K

        Sorry, but I was never an Andru fan, so Gasp65 would probably do what I would do with a collection of mint Andru comics: grade ’em, bag ’em, and sell ’em.

        N

        Liked by 1 person

      • Krackles January 18, 2022 / 07:00

        N,

        Your uncatholic wisdom leaves me macrocephalicly hollow-eyed!

        P.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Krackles January 18, 2022 / 12:34

        Good or bad, as long as everyone is talking about Andru, that’s all that matters.

        Believe me guys, you won’t stop hearing about it until you’ll end up praising Ross Andru.

        Incidentally, I believe I figured out how to properly place my comment chronologically in this disjointed UI.

        Liked by 1 person

    • nealumphred January 17, 2022 / 13:23

      PS: While I am always suspicious of people who use coincidences as an explanation for a complicated action or event, I love the small ones that pop up almost daily.

      While the three of us are conversing here on an article about a fairly obscure artist named Tallarico, I just sent birthday greetings to a Facebook friend whose last name is Talarico.

      Like

      • gasp65 January 17, 2022 / 16:03

        I’m sure we agree that coincidences are quite common and rarely cosmic — they just don’t get noticed all that often. Still, I do think that’s a rather nifty one. Happy birthday to your friend!

        If it weren’t for small matters like the pandemic and oceans and continents separating us, I daresay it would be likely be fun to get together with you guys over a couple of pitchers for an evening of lively discussion!

        Cul sec!

        Liked by 1 person

      • Krackles January 17, 2022 / 16:08

        Indeed, Santé !

        Liked by 1 person

  8. nealumphred January 17, 2022 / 18:57

    GASP65 and KRACKLES

    The comments section here won’t allow me to place my replies exactly where they belong but I wanted to say that I L-O-V-E-D Barry Smith’s CONAN!

    Here’s another anecdote: I had a table at one of Seuling’s shows in NYC in the early ’70s. Some kid was walking around with a stack of fifty near-mint CONANS (multiple copies of each of the first ten issues) asking $1 each but you had to buy them all.

    I didn’t even hesitate to give the kid the money and quickly sold ten copies of CONAN #1 for $10 each! I don’t remember what I got for the others.

    Those were the days …

    NEAL

    Like

      • nealumphred January 18, 2022 / 08:22

        K

        It must be very interesting doing acid and walking around Japan these days …

        N

        Like

    • Krackles January 18, 2022 / 06:50

      I assume you kept at least one copy of each issue for yourself and I hope you used that money wisely… Like buying loads of new comics 😉

      Liked by 1 person

      • nealumphred January 18, 2022 / 08:14

        GASP65

        I am in the Seattle, Washington, area. Where are you that we are separated by oceans and continents?

        NEAL

        Like

      • gasp65 January 18, 2022 / 08:20

        I meant the three of us: I’m across the border and the continent in Montréal, and Krackles is overseas, in France.

        Liked by 1 person

      • nealumphred January 18, 2022 / 09:08

        GASP65

        Well, if I moved to my original home state of Pennsylvania and you moved down to the Toronto area, we could get together for the occasional pint or ten and wish Krackles was there to hear us making fun of Ross Andru’s art.

        N

        Liked by 1 person

      • redscraper January 18, 2022 / 10:27

        Can I just say that this conversation is really entertaining to watch from the sidelines?

        Liked by 2 people

      • nealumphred January 18, 2022 / 10:51

        REDSCRAPER

        Can I just say that you’re no longer on the sidelines?

        NEAL

        Liked by 2 people

      • nealumphred January 18, 2022 / 08:15

        K

        I already had them all, purchased at newsstands (there being no comic shops at the time—at least in most of the US). And, yes, I bought more comics.

        N

        Like

  9. nealumphred January 19, 2022 / 12:33

    KRACKLES

    Hah! My last comment ended up exactly where I wanted it! How did I do that?

    NEAL

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s